I took the call in question: I have tried other studies on this "dangerous drink." Thanks to Google I have found, for example, what appears to be the original version in English of the appeal, and the survey and analysis conducted by the broadcaster CBC in Canada and the investigation of antibufala Snopes.com, which show that the appeal was in 2000 and that his main accusations are completely fasulle.Per example, "glucuronolactone (which in Italian is called proper glucuronolactone) and are in the Red Bull, but is not a hazardous chemical developed by the Department of Defense in the sixties of last century as a hallucinogen for its troops in Vietnam. It 'a carbohydrate, a type of sugar found naturally in the human body and in foods such as wheat and wine rosso.Va said that a can of Red Bull contains 600 mg of glucuronolactone, believed to be 250 times the normal daily dose, but known as Snopes.com, or the archive of the British Medical Journal nor the site of the Food and Drug Administration, the authority which regulates any substance present in food and drugs in the U.S., include information that may suggest the danger in these high doses (and usually the FDA there is heavy). The appeal contains even dangerous advice : that of having to make physical activity after drinking Red Bull, otherwise the 'withering attack. " In fact, the caffeine content of Red Bull (equal to a cup of coffee, three times that a can of Coca-Cola) and sugar (about 5 teaspoons per 250 ml can) make a drink not suitable in case of intense physical activity. Not only Red Bull is not the body replenishes the substances lost during exercise, as do, however, the so-called "sports drinks", but contains so much caffeine can cause dehydration, which in turn puts strain on the site cuore.Il Red Bull itself, among other things, recommended in the FAQ to drink the drink "before demanding athletic activities," but also warns that "there has been formulated to provide hydration," and then calls "who engages in sports Drinking too much water during intense exercise. "The appeal also states that Red Bull contains unspecified "components that dilute the blood," but does not say what, and that none of the ingredients of the drink has this effect. Even the news that France and Denmark have banned the drink because of the combination of its "components of vitamin" is a half-glucuronolactone joined the buffalo: the prohibition of marketing exist, but because of concerns about its high caffeine content and doubts about the effect of the combination of caffeine, taurine and glucuronolactone, another ingredient Red Bull, which despite its name is not removed (as it wants an urban legend) from the testes of bulls but is produced synthetically and is an ingredient of infant formula for neonati.Questo not mean that you can be casual use of these soft drinks containing high doses of stimulants: apart from the ingestion of large amounts of sugar (goodbye to the line) if you do not use version "sugar free" and of caffeine (dehydrating), any combination of drinks like Red Bull with alcohol may give a false sense of sobriety very dangerous, according to a study conducted in Brazil by psychology professor Maria Lucia Souza-Formigoni of the University of Sao Paulo and cited by the BBC. Who is drunk and not be aware of risks to drive or perform other actions challenging without realizing that their ability to react and evaluation are alterate.Siamo in short, the usual: the call plays on our fears of substances from the names on the myth of the mysterious and sadistic ease with which large companies shove poisons in food without noticing that the authorities, and is even counterproductive in the end, spreading misinformation and raising a cloud of dust which prevents discussion of the risks specifically related to the use of these senseless drinks.
